OUTLINE OF GEN 3
Satan,
by means of a creature here called the serpent, deceives Eve, v. 1-5.
Both
she and Adam disobey the divine command, and fall into sin and
misery, v. 6-7.
God
desires the fellowship with Adam and Eve. v. 8-9
The
departure of man from God and man’s denial of guilt. v. 10-13
The
creature called the serpent is degraded and punished, v. 14.
The
promise of redemption by the incarnation of Christ, v. 15.
Eve
sentenced, Adam sentenced v. 16-17.
The
ground cursed, and death threatened, v. 18-19.
Why
the woman was called Eve, v. 20.
Adam
and Eve clothed with skins, v. 21.
The
wretched state of our first parents after their fall and their
expulsion from the garden of Paradise, v. 22-24.
Things
to Note:
Satan comes as serpent v. 1
The subtlety of the temptation
- The first insinuation is to doubt God; then disobey God, and then finally deny God.
- There is a three-fold temptation:
- Physical – Bodily – fruit that is good to eat
- Mental – “delight to the eye”
- Spiritual – “desire to make one wise”
- Gen. 3:15 is the first promise and prophecy of the coming Redeemer.
THE
SERPENT
The
Serpent:
- The serpent was apparently a beautiful creature, in its uncursed state, that Satan used in the temptation.
- The serpent it seems stood at the head of all the inferior animals.
- He was an animal of the field, therefore not a domesticated animal
- He seemed to show more wisdom and understanding than all the other animals.
- He was more crafty; i.e. clever; than the other animals. But it is obvious from the whole gist of this context that the term is employed in a bad sense, implying craft, cunning, guile and, accordingly, others have more appropriately translated it to be skilled in all manner of deceit and mischief, any beast of the field.
- There is a good chance that he walked erect, or at least on all fours. This is necessarily implied in his punishment –“on thy belly shalt thou go.
- Was he gifted with speech or did Satan speak through him is not clear. In either case it did not cause Eve alarmed.
- He also seem to have the gift of reason, we see him reasoning and disputing with Eve. Again however Satan influenced this, but to what extent we do not know.
It seems apparent that it was not the
serpent, as a sagacious and crafty animal, responsible for the
temptation, but that the serpent was simply the tool of that evil
spirit, who is met with in the further course of the world's history
under the name of Satan (the opponent), or the Devil, the slanderer
or accuser.
Gen 3:1-8
3:1 Now the serpent was more cunning
than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said
to the woman, "Has God indeed said, 'You shall not eat of every
tree of the garden'?" 2 And the woman said to the serpent, "We
may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; 3 but of the fruit of
the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, 'You
shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.' " 4
Then the serpent said to the woman, "You will not surely die. 5
For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened,
and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." 6 So when the
woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to
the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its
fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. 7
Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they
were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves
coverings. 8 And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the
garden in the cool of the day, and Adam and his wife hid themselves
from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden.
THE TEMPTATION AND THE FALL (vv. 1-7)
What we have here is an account of the
temptation with which Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them
into sin, and which proved fatal to them.
“from any tree of the garden?” The
question was designed to suggest that God was not good and fair
because He had restricted the eating of the fruit of one of the
trees. The serpent quotes the command fallaciously, as if it were a
ban, not only of that tree, but of all. God had said, “Of every
tree you may eat, except one.” Satan, by aggravating the exception,
endeavors to invalidate the concession: “Hath God said, You shall
not eat of every tree?” The divine law cannot be rebuke unless it
is first misrepresented.
The serpent calls God by the name of
Elohim alone, and the woman does the same. In this more general and
indefinite name the personality of the living God is obscured. To
attain his end, the tempter felt it necessary to change the living
personal God into a merely general God, and to exaggerate the
prohibition, in the hope of exciting in the woman's mind partly
distrust of God Himself, and partly a doubt as to the truth of His
word.
The serpent’s words were listened to.
Instead of turning away, the woman replied, "We may eat of the
fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which
is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it,
neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." She was aware of the
ban, therefore, and fully understood its meaning; but she added,
"neither shall ye touch it," and proved by this very
exaggeration that it appeared too stringent even to her, and
therefore that her love and confidence towards God were already
beginning to waver.
Here was the beginning of her fall:
"for doubt is the father of sin, and skeptics the mother of all
transgression; and in this father and this mother, all our present
knowledge has a common origin with sin" (Ziegler). From doubt,
the tempter advances to a direct denial of the truth of the divine
threat, and to a malicious suspicion of the divine love
Now that Eve had entered into
conversation, the seducer advanced his more powerful argument. He
quickly suggested that man's great desire to be on a par with and
truly like God had been deliberately thwarted by divine command.
Their understanding will be greatly enlightened and improved; and
they will be as gods, like God. As the original word is the same
which is used to point out the Supreme Being, Gen 1:1, so it has here
the same signification, and the object of the tempter appears to have
been this: to persuade Eve and then Adam that they should, by eating
of this fruit, become wise and powerful as God (for knowledge is
power,) and be able to exist forever, independently of him.
The serpent charged the Creator with
selfishness and with a malicious falsehood, representing him as
envious and unwilling for his creatures to have something that would
make them like the Him.
It should be pointed out that this was
the first falsehood the woman ever heard. Her mind was also immature,
so far as experience was concerned. The opening mind is naturally
inclined to believe the truth of every assertion, until it has
learned by experience the falsehood of some.
The Fruit
1. The fruit appeared to be wholesome
and nutritious. And that it was pleasant to the eyes.
2. The beauty of the fruit tended to
wet and increase appetite. And a tree to be desired to make one wise,
which was,
3. An additional motive to please the
palate. From these three sources all natural and moral evil sprang.
Eve saw the tree not only with the eye
of sense. But also with the eye of fancy, highly excited by the hints
of the tempter. Eve saw that it was not only good for food, but also
to be desired to make one wise. Appetite, taste, and the love of
wisdom, are the great motives in the human heart and mind, which
assumes this tree, will gratify. Other trees satisfy the taste and
the sight. But this one has the pre-eminent charm of administering
not only to the sense, but also to the reason.
Eve took it. It was her own act and
deed. The devil did not take it, and put it into her mouth, whether
she would or not take it was up to her, and so she took it. Satan may
tempt, but he cannot force; may persuade us to cast ourselves down,
but he cannot cast us down.
Eve gets Adam to Bite
It is more than likely that Adam was
not with Eve when she was tempted, but came to her when she had
eaten. She gave it to him, persuading him with the same arguments
that the serpent had used with her, adding this to all the rest, that
she herself had eaten of it, and found it so far from being deadly
that it was extremely pleasant and grateful. Stolen waters are sweet.
It seems those that have themselves done wrong are commonly willing
to draw in others to do the same. Just like the devil, Eve was no
sooner a sinner than a tempter.
Adam ate, overcome by his wife. It is
pointless to ask, "What would have been the consequence if Eve
only had transgressed?" The wisdom of God, we are sure, would
have decided the difficulty. However Adam did eat, this act involved
disbelief of God's word, together with confidence in the devil's. In
neglecting the tree of life of which he was allowed to eat, and
eating of the tree of knowledge, which was forbidden, he plainly
showed contempt of the favors God had bestowed on him, and a
preference given to those God did not see fit for him.
The ultimate consequences of the
transgression. Shame and fear seized Adam and Eve, in the fact
itself; these came into the world along with sin, and still attend
it.
Adam and Eve both strong fell under a
strong conviction. Their eyes were opened. The eyes of their
consciences were opened, their hearts broken for what they had done.
Now, when it was too late, they saw the folly of eating forbidden
fruit. They saw a loving God provoked, his grace and favor forfeited,
his likeness and image lost, dominion over the creatures gone. They
saw their natures corrupted and depraved, and felt a disorder in
their own spirits of which they had never before been conscious.
They quickly made aprons or (girdles)
to provide some measure of concealment as they looked for a cure for
their bewilderment, loneliness, and guilt. The fall of man had
occurred.
No comments:
Post a Comment